My thoughts on Presidential elections and our Presidential choices

Well, everyone is gearing up for Election season again, and again we are faced with poor choices, poor questions (and faker answers!), and really poor media coverage (that's what happens when all the big media is owned by 5 giant companies. Lots of diversity there! Yup!). A close friend of mine asked me about who I was voting for, and my thoughts in general on the candidates that we have to choose from (well, at least the ones that the Media decides to talk about). Also, today I tried multiple times to give my thoughts on John Edwards little spot on YouTube, but it wouldn't accept my post (I guess a few paragraphs is too much, but it's ok if people want to spit out 1-liners about all Democrats being Commies (I don't like the Dems any, but, are you fucking stupid??)), so, I decided to take my views somewhere else (and perhaps that's good. I don't really feel like swatting away the flame-trolls that lurk amongst YouTube.).

One thing that everyone needs to understand that 99.999999999999999999999% of the time any politician makes it to the preliminaries and has the blessings from their political party to run for prez, is a totally corrupt ass who will sell us out to their corporate (ie, campaign donors) interests in a heart beat. Politicians - as you already know - are fantastic at telling us what we want to hear as elections turn around. John Kerry talked about how every vote would be counted, and what did he do? He threw in the towel amidst numerous instances of reported voter fraud (1, 2)! Kerry was a total puppet; he was never meant to win, he was just there to further the illusion of "democracy" and further pound into people's heads the illusion of this left/right paradigm. There's a spectacular documentary that talks about this entitled American Dictators: Documenting the Staged Election of 2004. Even if you just watch the first 10 minutes, it's a real eye opener.

There are also a few articles pertaining to how this left/right thing is simply a phony paradigm:
Field of Screams: The Real Election Winners and Losers (from the Online Journal)
Meet the New Boss: Same as the Old Boss (from PrisonPlanet.com, by Paul Joseph Watson & Alex Jones)
Conyers Toes Party Line: No Impeachment (from Infowars.net, by Steve Watson)
Bush Shields Clinton Scandals (from News Max)

Now often, there are candidates who will try to run, and are actually honest (gasp!), but are usually doomed from the start since they run from a 3rd party (like 2004's Libertarian candidate Michael Badnarik). There are some exceptions to this, like Republican Congressman Ron Paul who used to run on a Libertarian ticket, but now (obviously) runs as a Republican. Ron Paul is running for president this time around and while I know that he will not reach it to the preliminaries (despite the fact that many call him founding father material), I still support him 100%. Now, another politician that I pro-actively support is Georgia's (now former) Congresswoman Cynthia McKinney. While she isn't running for president, she's a phenomenal politician and she's been very active in pursuing things that are in actual interest of the American people (as apposed to the numbers of politicians that voted for the Patriot Act when it wasn't even open to read. Isn't that wonderful? Politicians voted for the Patriot Act even when Bush labeled the entire contents "classified"!). The Democrats that I am aware that are at the fore-front with talking about running for president are largely Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton, are terrible choices. Neither hold the interests that are anything but that which benefits the corporations, and none of them talk about (or do anything about) the erosion of our civil liberties, or about how the Federal Reserve is bankrupting us (1, 2), or how we need to get rid of the electronic voting machines... Naturally of course, the big-name Republicans that are running aside from Ron Paul are poor choices as well.

Many times we are faced with two choices: vote third party, or don't vote. If Ron Paul doesn't make it to the end, I won't be voting. I would never vote for someone whom I know is controlled by the corporations, and likewise I wouldn't vote for someone I knew nothing about. I would not be able to live with myself if I were to simply vote for the guy who says most of what I want to hear but doesn't act on it (Dennis Kucinich is a great example of this)

Ask yourself, how many times do you hear these big-name campaign runners talk about preserving AND restoring the Bill of Rights and US Constitution? Sometimes they'll act like they care about this, but you'll never see them actually do something about it. How many have actually tried to appeal the the numerous pieces of Police State legislation (Military Commissions Act, Victory Act, New Freedom Initiative, Patriot Act 1 & 2..)? When will one of them step forward to shut down the Federal Reserve and repeal the 1913 Federal Reserve Act that has been bleeding us dry for nearly 100 years now? When will they make efforts to stop the militarization of the police (how many times have I seen Police with semi-automatic rifles all around NYC? Too many) and restore Posse Commitatus? Certainly if there is a brain amongst our elected officials, why do we still have rampant voter fraud at each election? Why has no one booted our lame-duck president out of office for tearing apart the Bill of Rights and US Constitution? These are the real issues that no one wants to discuss; all we hear about is the war in Iraq and gay marriage and who said what inflammatory comment.. It's absurd. We should expect more from our elected officials, and certainly demand it daily.

It doesn't matter who is voted for, the person that wins will be no different than what we have now.

Think your vote counts? Think again!

"Hacking Democracy" on Google Video

Hacking Democracy (HBO Special)
Electronic voting machines count about 87% of the votes cast in America today. But are they reliable? Are they safe from tampering? From a current congressional hearing to persistent media reports that suggest misuse of data and even outright fraud, concerns over the integrity of electronic voting are growing by the day. And if the voting process is not secure, neither is America's democracy. The timely, cautionary documentary HACKING DEMOCRACY exposes gaping holes in the security of America's electronic voting system.

At the end of this Film
Cleveland, Ohio. Dec. 23rd 2005. Cuyahoga County spent 22 million Dollars on these Diebold voting system. Cuyahoga did not change there mind after a hearing. What does this tell you? Business as usual, and F the American people, we're using them anyway. Argue all you want! They are going to what they want, not what we want. Sign up for NATIONAL HAND COUNT REGISTRY HERE http://www.bbvforums.org/cgi-bin/forums/board-profile.cgi?action=register
Black Box Voting WebSite
http://www.blackboxvoting.org
Forum
http://www.bbvforums.org/cgi-bin/forums/discus.cgi
HBO Info
http://www.hbo.com/docs/programs/hackingdemocracy/synopsis.html
I'm a 911 Activist Chuck Newell, and it time to make a change in a America, and fix our Voting System

Everyone should be concerned about this. This is what is getting every corrupt, criminal politician into office; especially Bush and the other Republicans I know you all can't stand. America can not be changed if we sit and do nothing. We are faced with a choice, live in ignorance and reap the rewards in more tyranny and even more evil politicians and stolen elections to come, or we can educate ourselves, inform others, send letters to our elected officials and hold their feet to the flames so they do the right thing. Please copy and paste this into your blog, myspace, or wherever and help spread this. What's the point in voting if your vote doesn't count and the corporations elect these politicians into office and not the people?

related items of interest:
Very wierd result in the CT race. Lamont loses with EXACT number that republican did in 2000| Daily Kos
How They Stole The Mid-Term Election| London Guardian
Field of screams: The real election winners and losers| Online Journal
Stoopidest Sleepover Security Ever: Black Box Voting blows through memory card seal| Black Box Voting.org
Security Analysis of the Diebold AccuVote-TS Voting Machine| Princeton University
Shocking election-theft testimony| AlterNet
None dare call it voter suppression and fraud| Free Press.net
Meet The New Boss, Same As The Old Boss| PrisonPlanet.com

Clinton hysteria = Media hysteria = Partisan hysteria

Recently (although it's a bit of old news now), Bill Clinton was on Fox News and was questioned as to why he didn't do more to capture Osama bin Laden and prevent terrorism from reaching the US. Clinton went off on the Fox News's Chris Wallace ranting about right-wingers this and fox that and hit piece, etc.. Typically, two things happen as a result of this:

1) The media goes into a frenzy of this "new top story" of an "outrageous Clinton" that turned into a mad man (which he did, really) and doesn't bother to focus on much of anything he said after he stopped his temper tantrum. Not that any of it was real honesty, but that's the perfect opportunity for the media to expose this lie that has been going on for years now. The Daily Show showcased this fantastically

2) The left is now making a backlash saying "what about Bush?", and crying for "poor innocent Clinton". The media will most likely never focus on Bush's lack of interest in bin Laden because we all know that would make them "liberal" and such strong criticism (and hollow) is what really hurt we the people during the Reagan years. Big Media is filled with enough disinformation to gloss over most of Bush's mistakes/crimes and throws in just enough to forget about the more serious crimes of Clinton.

Clinotn had more than one chance to nab bin Laden, but he chose not to. Why? Well that's really simple: bin Laden is the boogey man that they need to help keep the people nice and afraid so they can pass their repugnant police-state legislation. Democrats try to brush off Clinton's oversight with excuses and claims that it's a lie, and Republicans do the same with Bush my just repeating whatever their favourite discredited media pundit has told them (commonly, "bin Laden doesn't matter")

People need to wake up and understand that this left/right thing is a phoney paradigm. There isn't much difference between Clinton and Bush other than some social issues. There wasn't much difference between Bush and Kerry, either. All this back and forth bickering, it just polarises each side and people pay less attention to issues and more attention to partisan matters. It's pathetic each time. A great distraction, while America descends into a Police-State

9/11: A 5 year lie, and why you should care

5 years ago the US Government sold its people the laughable conspiracy theory that 19 hijackers with box cutters were able to over power airline pilots that were former military officers and then proceed to hit their targets with bulls-eye precision even though their own flight instructors acknowledged that they were totally incompetent pilots and keep the entire fleet of NORAD from responding and shooting them down. George Bush made the claim that there was no prior knowledge and that these terrorists hate us for our freedoms.

For over 2 years now I have studied this tragic event and I have spent countless hours researching, looking for answers. The Government's official story is nothing more than a fairy tale sold to the people as an excuse to take away our liberties and enslave us. Whenever there is doubt expressed to the official story of 9/11, automatically people are called "conspiracy theorists" even though the ones that throw this label around have rarely (if ever) bothered to research this event. It's a common thing throughout history for governments to attack their own people and blame it on a foreign enemy as an excuse for war and domestic martial law. Nero did it, and Hitler did it, and the Russians have done it, and even the US Government admits to doing it multiple times. Ever hear of Operation Northwoods? It's pretty important that you know what that was. Operation Northwoods was a plan by the Joint Chiefs of Staff to have a staged attack and blame it on Cuba as an excuse for war. This is declassified, as you can see in the link I provided. There have been others, like Operation Gladio, and Operation Ajax (find out more about admitted instances of false flag operations).

Similarly, 9/11 was an inside job, carried out by the government as an excuse for war and martial law. Their official story has fallen apart at every turn and this can be seen through numerous piles of evidence. This isn't some conspiracy theory. This isn't partisan politics. This isn't paranoia. This is our sad state of affairs and it's important that everyone educates themselves and fights this New World Order so that we don't end up like Hitler's Germany completely.

On Wednesday, July 25th 2001Alex Jones predicted a coming attack that was promoted by the government. He based this on openly available information.

Alex Jones made a fantastic documentary entitled "Martial Law 9/11: Rise of the Police State", and I urge everyone to watch it. This is about more than exposing Bush-the-puppet. This is about ending these false-flag operations for good. Please, for the sake of liberty, for your rights, and for a better future, watch this documentary:

Martial Law 9/11: Rise of the Police State

related: 600+ Articles that tear the government's official conspiracy theory to shreds

"How do you boil a frog?

You don't throw the frog into a pot of boiling water, it would immediately jump out. You let the frog sit in warm water and slowly heat the pan until the frog boils to death.

How do you erect the infrastructure of a police state?

You incrementally condition both the police and the public that relinquishing liberty in the name of security is necessary because 'we live in dangerous times.'

Be sure to make Grandpa remove his shoes at the airport but let that cargo through without inspection every time. The truth is that the mythical 'war on terror' was never meant to be won and can never be won because it doesn't exist.

The real terror is being waged against ordinary people by our own government.

To say we live in a police state is no longer an alarmist cliche. Perception has clearly and permanently shifted from the police being there to serve the people to the police being there to control the people."

- Paul Joseph Watson. From his 11/29/05 article entitled American Police State: The Frog Has Cooked

I know many of you are not interested in Politics, and that's fine. But for the sake of freedom, for the sake of keeping the United States from turning into WW2 Germany, stand up and do something! Inform others and inform yourself.

note: Again, if anyone would like to send this to that phoney Perry Logan, you may direct him to my political blog. Better yet, look at his arguments with others and see that all he does is go in circles. As I pointed out last year, he has no base, only spin.

More sources of information for those interested

Documentaries:
TerrorStorm
911 The Road to Tyranny
Who Killed John O'Neill?

Other video:
9/11 Wargames discussion (It's admitted that NORAD had a drill of hijacked jets flying into buildings at 8am on 9/11!)
John O'Neil, the man who knew

Resources:
911 Research
911 Eyewitnesses


Articles:
Bombs in the Building: World Trade Center 'Conspiracy Theory' is a Conspiracy Fact By Randy Lavello
The Destruction of the World Trade Center: Why the Official Account Cannot Be True by Dr. David Ray Griffin
THE FEMA REPORT ON WORLD TRADE CENTER 7 COLLAPSE IS A TOTAL JOKE.
THE TOP 40 REASONS TO DOUBT THE OFFICIAL STORY OF SEPTEMBER 11th, 2001

9/11 Debunkers debunk themselves

It's interesting how now every time someone mentions objections to the official story of 9/11, the so called conspiracy debunkers come out (or at least get mention ala linking to their blogs). Oh yes, we already know that I've dealt with and exposed Perry Logan for the fraud that he is, but there are plenty of others that are a little less retarded on the surface than Mr. Logan. A popular one I see is 9/11 Conspiracy Smasher. Many of these so-called debunkings have been as of late tied in part to the critique of Loose Change that has been flying around like wild. Oh no, I'm not saying they're wrong about the film per se, as it certainly had a number of problems with accuracy as WTC7.net pointed out so truthfully. The problem lays in how things are tackled when there is nothing to debunk it. Screw Loose Change talked about the claims of former pilot Russ Wittenberg and specifically when he mentioned how a 767 could not of performed the aeronautical movements it supposedly did to hit the Pentagon due to the fact that it would of encountered a high-speed buffet and fallen out of the sky, well, it was counted with calling him a "conspiracy theorist". This is - apparently - an acceptable means of proving someone wrong and debunking their claims: petty, ignorant, and furthermore unsupported name calling.


Now tell me, are not the "conspiracy theorists" supposed to be the ones that are so petty, and that must rely upon such horribly poor arguments? It's interesting also how little of the official story supporters of the government's conspiracy theory know. When explaining trying to explain the manoeuvres that the plane supposedly took to hit the Pentagon, I am responded to with an answer that is little short of "duh". My personal debates aside though, we constantly see disinfo being promoted by these supposed debunker blogs. Loose Change is the most common strawman. The ignorant and intellectually lazy (or those fearful of the truth) simply point to this each time as if that somehow contained all the issues covered with 9/11. Then we see the wonderful conclusions of innocence because a certain person says they are. Larry Silverstein says he didn't mean demolish when he said "pull it", so therefore it's so! Never mind the fact that everyone who believes he was talking about demolition thinks that he slipped up (this is ignored), and that if he did come forward and admitted to being in on the demolition, he would be under arrest for insurance fraud as well as possible prior knowledge of 9/11. These little facts escape the reality of such debunkers because for some odd reason their brains turn to garbage the minute they are faced to even think about how a respected nation would pull off a false flag operation on its people.

Constantly from the supposed debunkers we see theories instead of facts. I haven't been able to have 1 discussion concerning 9/11 without a "debunker" using a strawman disinfo tactic to try to squelch that which they can not disprove. Why is this? Why is it that if I and others that agree with me are such crack pot loonies that are duped so easily and are so paranoid and have nothing but baseless theories, why is it that our arguments are met with such transparent idiocy and disinformation? Many people fear the truth, I believe. People cling to what they want to believe and refuse to give thought to anything else.

I try to look for the truth. Whether it is something I agree with or do not agree with, to me truth is the most important thing of all. I have on many occasions spent time reading these “debunker” blogs and have spent time trying to find something incriminating on men like Alex Jones and the words they say. I’ve spent time on both sides of this fence, as have many, and so therefore I have seen both sides of this coin and I do not have to fear one side or another being wrong because I do not cling to these beliefs like many do a personal bible. I suggest that everyone should read these blogs, and listen to these supposed debunkers. It’s quite amusing as you study more about 9/11, but irregardless, listen to them and check their info and see if it indeed holds up. If you feel it does, then dig deeper and deeper until you find what the truth really is.

Perhaps another day I will take the time to show these poor arguments made by the supposed debunkers in detail.

Fox talks about 9/11!?

Fox - the biggest Bush-worshiping media outlet on TV - actually made mention of the 9/11 doccumentary Loose Change

I am amazed that they dared to do it and actually didn't try to hard to smear it either. Of course, they didn't bother to mention much of it, but still..

Part 1
Part 2

Related: 4 years of lies: What really happened on 9/11, and why you should care

Freedom sign in

I've been involved in this movement for only 3 years, which is a pale comparison to many others but the more I get involved, the newer the faces are that I see around me. I really don't think that Alex is far off when he says that more and more people are waking up every day. I've reached out to a lot of people, and I've spent a lot of time on specific issues - both studying them and defending my views on them. Of course, experience really is the best teacher. I give out activist CD's to friends and associates which contain documentaries to educate and wake others up. However, often after waking up, people are often left confused or even frightened. So, I created this to try to reach out to those who wanted to do more but weren't sure where or how to take the first step.

[b]Educate[/b]

Study the issues indepthly. If you don't know enough about something, but trust the source, then don't talk about it - you'll make an ass of yourself (I have!).

[b]Debate[/b]

Bring this issue up to people and debate it. Not only will you see different aspects of things, but it will encourage you to do more research. I've learned a lot through this.

[b]Weigh it in[/b]

Can you prove yourself wrong?

[b]Reach out[/b]

Spread the word! Distribute books, pamphlets, cd's, dvd's, urls, and words! I recently bought George Humphrey's booklet 9/11: The Great Illusion (http://tinyurl.com/dryqa($15 for 5, not bad!)) and have been distributing it to people. Also, I burn activist cd's that contain the best documentaries I've seen so far, and hand it out (contact me (phracktivist@gmail.com) if you would like to request one, or would like a list of contents).

Blogging, articles, etc

[b]Emphasize[/b]

People need to understand that all this isn't just about exposing Bush. It goes so much deeper and that's why it's important for everyone to get involved (Constitution (http://tinyurl.com/2vuk6), Martial Law (http://tinyurl.com/87cz7), Freedom (http://tinyurl.com/drfbj)). If people do not understand the urgency, they will not join this cause.

[b]Utilize free tools[/b]

Make full use of free resources on the net! Link everyone to sites that contain streaming media of 9/11 documentaries (or hell, link to any site that offers these for free to download).

[i]Tinyurl.com[/i] allows you to turn a huge url into something very small. This is a great tool for saving space. Sprawl it on the back of a book you are giving someone, write it anywhere that that extra bit of space is needed.

[b]GoogleVideo, Yousendit, etc.[/b]

When I began my venture through this, there was no such thing as GoogleVideo, and YouTube wasn't around either (or was just starting out). The world of massive streaming media on the web was just starting to gain in popularity. Now days, you can find most any documentary on GoogleVideo, and there's a plethora of short clips on YouTube. The fact that you can embed these videos almost anywhere, is fantastic because this has allowed a lot of people to be able to reach out to many others without making anyone feel pressured to watch something (or, giving them a DVD and watching it collect dust).