Clinton hysteria = Media hysteria = Partisan hysteria
Recently (although it's a bit of old news now), Bill Clinton was on Fox News and was questioned as to why he didn't do more to capture Osama bin Laden and prevent terrorism from reaching the
1) The media goes into a frenzy of this "new top story" of an "outrageous
2) The left is now making a backlash saying "what about Bush?", and crying for "poor innocent
Clinotn had more than one chance to nab bin Laden, but he chose not to. Why? Well that's really simple: bin Laden is the boogey man that they need to help keep the people nice and afraid so they can pass their repugnant police-state legislation. Democrats try to brush off Clinton's oversight with excuses and claims that it's a lie, and Republicans do the same with Bush my just repeating whatever their favourite discredited media pundit has told them (commonly, "bin Laden doesn't matter")
People need to wake up and understand that this left/right thing is a phoney paradigm. There isn't much difference between Clinton and Bush other than some social issues. There wasn't much difference between Bush and Kerry, either. All this back and forth bickering, it just polarises each side and people pay less attention to issues and more attention to partisan matters. It's pathetic each time. A great distraction, while America descends into a Police-State


0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home